![]() ![]() PTGui supports several of these cameras, including the Samsung Gear 360, Xiaomi Mijia Mi Sphere, Yi 360 VR and Ricoh Theta Z1. Several single shot 360° panoramic cameras exist, producing a single image containing two circular fisheye images side by side. How can I stitch images taken with a 360° one shot camera in PTGui? You don’t need a separate download of the template.Ħ.43. We sadly do not have the money for a THETA Z1īecause we just bought a DJI Mavic Air drone 1100$ in sek =10 175.2925 Swedish kronor Many mistake this and do mess up the stitching. You have to mark the Control points in the overlapped arias only Remember the images are 1 and 2 number 2 are a copy Yes on (Xaomi MiSphere camera) and the (Garmin Virb 360 camera) the image and copys are horizontal but the Raw files from (Insta36 ONE X) they are Vertical When you set the control points, the images are horizontal and you select the left sphere in image 1 and the right sphere in image 2? To be able to get a good precise batch stitch on hundreds of images We have to crop the images do to small differences in the camera hardware No it is the two images when we mowed the building to the center! Why are you looking at this screen? To verify the stitch line? Not necessarily i think the THETA Z1 are quite good in level! Oh, do I need to straighten the image with the mouse? And yes, "real" photographers are probably horrified at what I do.Oh, do I need to straighten the image with the mouse Will be interested in any articles on RT and other packages. at what looks like a correct exposure, which may vary from the camera's auto exposure, and then adjust the same image ± a certain amount (often a stop or more) then merge the three, usually add local contrast enhancement ( from g'mic) because of the softness after the merge, maybe add some tome-mapping). I did try RawTherapee at that time, but I found it really hard to use (what I usually do is take a "base" image i.e. The idea of 'rating' my images as a first step seems a waste of my time - I've already uploaded them to a PC and produced smaller screen-size jpegs to review which might be worth processing. But if I'd been using my SLR I'd have missed many of the shots because I had the wrong lens on it and didn't know what was coming up. For what I'm interested in (often, trains and photos from trains), recovering shadow detail is typically more important than highlights - boosting the exposure after the shot, when a compact camera is already on iso400 because the light was poor, is often a cause for pain. I still think that raw is the only way to go, so I currently use ufraw or nufraw with gimp-2.10. this weeks' rust vulnerability fix - need to find out if everything still builds) or for new shinier versions which may or may not be useful), and my backlog of images which turn out to be less good than I had hoped from glancing at the jpegs. So why am I only *almost* persuaded to give it another try ? Easy - lack of time (and too much of that is spent on updating other packages, either for fixes (e.g. A good article, it almost persuades me to have another try with darktable (I last tried a bit over 4 years ago, in the days of gimp-2.9, and installed it but failed to create a gimp plugin, so gave up). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |